- GUNA chintana again - why did MADHWACHARYA do acts like lifting boulders , wrestling , SHow of physical prowess , even though he was a SANYASI ?
- where were rakshasa to see all these ? if at all it was for them ? ..
- if it was to show he was HANUMAN .. lifting aboulder how come that PROVES he was HANUMAAN only ?
- teh question was not about GADA , why boulder lifting , wrestling , etc ?
- CAN we see any GUNA here of VAYU ?
- Suppose you were a witness to this event SAY you are standing by , few labourers are strugling to move a boulder ., and suddenly a very GREAT SANYASI comes and easily lifts it and keeps it aside.. WHAT will be your REACTION ? what thoughts will cross your mind ? ....
- IN mahabharta when a house was on fire .. BHEEMSENA lifted the entire house along wit inmates , from within fire and loacted it SAFELY .... SO why such ACTS ?
- remember there was ARJUN YUDHISTHIR all good and DIVINE persons , BUT they could not do THIS ACT ...
- there is a purpose ! think more deeply
- one more hint I will give - when faced with army of opponents or rakshshas teh first THING BHEEMSEN devaru does is to UPROOT a nearby tree / pole /stahmba , WHAT effect does that HAVE ?
- it sreally not necessary to fight each and every tillu pillu [ but when you stand calm and restrained even a tillu pillu comes forward to challenge ] , when you show core competency with MIGHT and SUCCESS in exemplary way , THE " also rans " in the field HOLD in high esteem and leave ur pATH , and do not harbour desire for confrontation .. [ it saves 90 % efforts ]
- SO only the HIGH and MIGHTY takes a dig at you ..
- and THAT dwell and subsequent DEFEAT of OPPONENT establishes the SUPREMACY very QUICKLY
- so show of STRENGTH is necessary ..
- IN MADHWACHARYA's time , HOSTILITY was everywhere , [ within BRAMHANAS . within scholars , within rulers , within preachers , within PEOPLE in general ] EVERYWHERE , VISHNU being SARVOTAMA was debatable // WHY debatable PEOPLE around were PREACHING confidently and had ESTABLSIHED with DECEIT taht OTHER than VISHNU SARVOTTAMATVA everything might be RIGHT ...
- NOW when a SMALL boy of ten eyars VENTURES out to say NO LOOK I ahve somethi9ng NEW .... what would be the REACTION ... ?
- when I first ventured on interenet with some unknow facts [ rather controversial ] the first of comments were ...1> MUST be some CRACK pARTY 2> may be he has just graduted of a vedic school is in a some cocoon 3> guy has lost his senses 4> not in touch wiuth reality 5> SO DO YOU THINK you are better than a VIVEKANANDA 6> is there a YOGYATA ? 7 > Have you ever addresed a GATHERING before to even know ABC of philosophy 8> seems has no experience at all 9 > has not seen world perhaps 10 > DO you know science [may be i am talking to an illiterate irrational ] 11> DO you know darwin ? 12> kabhi college gaye ho 13> CAN you prove it 14> c'mon in ten minutes I want all things erased , DONt dare write SUCH things ... 15 HE is CHAVENIST 16> he is RACIST 17 ATTACK him 18> teach hima lesson // 19 people like you dont come in front they talk from behind , come front we shall show what is what 20 > WHO ARE YOU ? WHAT DO YOU THINK OF YOURSELVES
- these were the incidents in childhood prior to taking SANYASA which gathering appreciated as { WE APPRECIATE an EXTRAORDINARY child } even teh FATHER of acharya reconciles saying ITS NONLY a CHILD .//// real problems started after taking SANYASA
- what happened then ? the very first day a TUSLLE enraged between ACHARYA's GURU and ACHARYA on ishtasiddhi
- Sameer Khatavkar [ we tend to forget issues in flow of ecstasy ] when a question of SANYASI arises , people tend to comment on his aspect of life [ why he is wearing that , why he needs a golden throne , why a bed , why shud he harbour ill will , cant
- WE are very much impressed by MADHWACHARYA and we do not do any manan , but rather go by translators view .. and sometimes take exactly opposing view on some other thread [ most do it unknowingly ]
- BUT is SANYAASI allowed to give LAAT ? is the grand question ? when we see a SANYASI we expecta MEEK person who would say OKAY its all RIGHT HARI CHITTA [ bhagavt praises that attitude at places ] SO whats SO different here ?
- i hope readers appreciate this point [ hopw its not out of -place ]
- if you are NOT a SANYASI you cannot preach in GENERAL to all sections and AS LEADER of HUMAN RACE /// people take words of SANYASI seriously ..
- THE idea of MADHWACHARYA was to reach PAN INDIA [ UNIVERSE in toto] and for that , his ESTABLISHED GREATNESS shoudl reach corners of COUNTRY ..
- EATING enormously , lifting boulders , subduing wrestlers , these were EXTREMELy popular in those days and CAUGHT immediate attention and hence interest in PEOPLE LIKE mayavaadi to SUBDUE him .. WHY that is necessary ?
- we can LEARN from LATEST episode OF MOHAN and AGNIVEER ... since it was MOHAN who gatecrashed AGNIVEERS SITE , he chose to IGNORE him and BAN him , defeating the LARGER PURPOSE ... BUT SUPPOSE if AGNIVEER is enough AGITATED to COMPEL him to confron MOHAN what will be the SCENARIO ?
- think and post your views all ! i will take a sbreak \
- Sachin could not have started as early as 15 had he not scored 300+ at under 14 .. so extraordinnary feat is must to make an early start else , one will ahve to play under 14 , then local trpohies , ranji , etc etc and wait as 12 th man and then start career .. by that time you are past prime .. So quick start needs extraordinary BRILLIANCE ..
- still more justice required to this thread
- at one point in debate , when opponent looses , he resorts to physical abuse ..people usually come prepared with such views [ SRISRI and ZAKIR NAIK debate , where he was absued and threatened ] physical prowess acts as detreent to all this ... AND alos its a MESSAGE to others [ especially the seers of the DAY ] without strength one must NOT VENTURE to preach ...
- when opponents are convinced the\at the other man is STRONG he debates , [ people when they are convinced that the other man is weak , they dont talk they oppress by show of strength ] ... so primarily a debate can occur in two circumstances 1> when the gathering has LOVE for the TRUTH 2> when gathering wants desperately to prove you wrong and cannot overpower you physically ..
- evalvating the things on a present note is always dangerous ... we are living in a transient world .. things change drastically within days .. as the power centres change , world becomes a diffrent place to be living in ,,, age old wisdom is must to ta
- how situations change ? in my college days .. MECHANICAL engg was considered as TOP education , all those who got 100 -90 marks in PCM [ physyics chemistry maths ] wre eligible and choosing only mechnaical engg .. CHEMICAL engg from VJTI was best closi
- world is going to drastically change .. there will be high polarisation .. only potent will survive
- a wise person is potent .. who is wise man one must take recourse to NEETI SHASTRA
- neeti shastra is taught by parents to sons and daughter ..
Search This Blog
Thursday, March 7, 2013
Madhwacharya Guna Chintane - 2
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment