NRIs giving pravachanas

• http://vimeo.com/60802822
• from the face reading and haav baah he looks more of an actor
• bakwaas ki had hoti hai , 1> madhwacharya theory is 10000years old , 2> earth rotating ,3> newtonian theory is TATVAVADA ... 4>realsim is not understood by BOOKS IT ahs to be realised .. 5> maharishis gave TATVAVADA thru their thinking ..
• In the name of TAtvavada , everything BUT TATTVAVADA [ and all excatly opposite to it has been SPOKEN subtly ] in a paper presentation ..
• why criticism here BECAUSE the root of the LOGIC seems to be inpresenting the WHOLE TATVAVADA as acceptable and in TUNE wiuth 16th century EUROPEAN thinking ... tthe fundamental base is being built on the BABYLONIAN theory of 10000 years old EARTH
• that is sheer insult TO VAYUDEV ... to amke him look as a NOMINAL thinker OUT TO IMPRESS world with a NEW THEORY asopposed to SANKARa [ who was also just a MODERN thinker of EAST in the eys of WESTERN scholars ] ... DO WE REALLY NEED this PERSPECTIVE ?
• MAY such perspective works with NEOSPIRITUALISTS with sceintific BENT of MIND ....rather loking for ARATIONALE behind MADHWA's words , BUT such people amke a HEINOUS crime of SEEING the GREAT devatas revered persons througha LENS all the while i the mind contemplating IS MADHWACHARYA just like others ... AND such an activity never GIVES the MAGNANIMOUS LARGER than UNIVERSE picture of ACHARYA MADHWA , who need not ahve come down to GIVE this TATVA VADA , but only to carry out ORDERS of VEDVYASAru , he has allowed himself to be subject of SCRUTINY for the ORDINARY
• WHILE to arrive at a conclusion that YES AMDHWA is only RIGHT , one may use some anecdotes , BUT for those who are into MADHWA FOLD , one need not explain TATVAVADA as a scientific theory ., which it is NOT , MADHWACHARYA need notbe portrayed as just another thinker who HAPPENS to be RIGHT .. MADHWACHARYA is our SAVIOUR , but for him and TATVAVADA we would be lamenting in HELLL . if thsi uapkara is not mentioned or realsied IT IS WASTE to talk about TATVAVADA , IF we talk about TATVAVADA ...as an intellectual persuit , it fetches nothing
• THERE is a undertone to impress upon young MINDS [ especially the educated youth withs cientific bent of mind ] that LOOK OUR TATTVAVADA is appreciated by teyh LIKES of PROFFESORS of UNIVERSITY fo west , intellectuals fo west , those settled in ABROAD and have been calling themseklves successful , SEE TATVAVADA influences YOU peers , SO DO have a LOOK at it ! this approach is NOT worth it .... PHILOSOPHY is NO INTELLECTUAL ROMANCE
• I strongly detest the IDEA of SOMEONE who does nOT even REALISE teh IMPORTANCE of basic DHARMA and VEDA and who does not ahve BARE MINIMUM CRITERIA of a UPADHAYAYA , venturing to TEACH others ... and that too with atone PERHAPS you DO know WHAT you ahve in your BACKYARD long forgooten .. ARE our youth so ILLPRESSED for SEERS
• OUR inspiration to leran TATVAVAVDA should come as a outcome of RESPECT and learnings from our OWN MATHADHIPATIS .. they shud form the source of our inspiration , SCHOLAR who ahs done SUDHA mangala and digested the thought process of JAYATEERTHARU and spent his life in a PAVITRA environment doing UPASAN shud be the TEACHER ...
• when a ordinary stands up and poses as TEACHER he DILUTES even the nectar to a LEVEL of NONALCOHOLIC carbonated .drinks
• what would have been the scene if pulakesin were among the audience ?
• sab mundi gala vertebral column 360 degrees ghumate
• a person whose fingers are all spread wide while talking , means , he is talking what HE knows NOT but with an aim to surprise ..
• when reading the LAxanas in neetishastras one quality was POINTED out repeatedly for dharmik works ... THAT is PAVITRA .... so MADHWAS must look into thsi quality when choosing to LISTEN to ANY PERSON ... DOES that PERSON LOOK PAVITRA ,,,..
• Mohan Suswaram the ire expressed is exactly in that PAIN that dont COMMODIFY , one can sell casetes ,cds and books on other SUBJECTS too atleast be truthful to TATVAVADA
• in the previous few decades the SELFPROCALIMEDLY the line between a STrictly leading [ life ] BRAMHAN and a "ashaddhala" seems to have vanished , the latter has UNABASHEDLY assumed his RIGHT to PREACH just ebcause he has a DEGREE under hsi eblt OR an ACHIEVEMENT .. this should change , SHASTRA rightful;y BELONGS to ONLY a SADBRAMHANA
• EVEN great RISHIS were made to do GOSEVA GURUSEVA before giving an upadesha , some cried fopr years why LEARNING ahve not blessed them , ALL THESE are to amkea MAN PAVITRA so that VIDYA embraces , ONE cannot in APAVITRA avastha talk and make SENSE .. [ the words PAVITRA says a lot]
• BUT he calims to have been validated bY DR Bannaje ... so where is the root ?
• OR is it that claimng an UMBRELLA called Dr BANNANJE anybody can shoot of posteria
• HE was equally amused , so a CT
• problem is all other groups are too pseudo secular to CRITICISE anything THE REALISM is missing
• ACTUALLY so much criticism was not warranted ... BUT the downside is INTERNET is HIGHLY vIRAl and can turn this FAULTY idea into GREAT pravachan within n minutes and PSEUDO secularly SPIRITUAL groups too pblige and make it a STATEMENT
• THEN it will eb struggle of another LONG debates to UNDO them .. by that time FATAL blow would have been dealt on MANY
• maa of all dogs dogma
• mre paas macbook hai projector hai screen hai iphone hai [ 9.8 foot G hai ] Tumhare paas jya hai
• aapajaan
• bladebabji bijoy
• thats indeed failure of B as he keeps producing such FIZLEss sodas
• as
• Hrishikesh Srivatsa will point these out NOW
• finally is being REAL an ism
• Viju ke andar ek keeda hai .. us keede ka B ke andar ke KEEDE se bahut PANGA hai aisa LAGTA hai ...
• B ke andar ka KEEDA kya hai ? MADHVA siddhant ke TEEKSHNA warheads [ tartamya , varnashram dharma , bhedha etc] ko arvasadharan banake pesh karna ...
• yeh VIDEO ekdum gend ki tarah VIJU ko milgaya ..
• Mohan Suswaram you ahve raised a valid question , why ?
• FOR answers we must analyse certain characteristics of a neo spiritual PERSON ..certain people are very much in competition with an EVIL populars and face failures , they at one hand admire the POPULISM of evil and at the same time having failed in attaining same height seek alternate
• while seeking alternate themotive is ONLY to make adent at the POPULISM and not in dwelling deep into reality , IN the process [ as the alternate our siddhanta is GOLD mine ] in the evry first few pages enough material is found to contravene and make a dent .. so teh NEO-S immdeiately closes the book and rushes toa ccomplish his mission ...
• th first few rounds of success HE REVELS and then very lately he opens the BOOK again .. and again finds few more tenets and rushes out to ahve a new WAGE of antiPOPULIST agenda ... IN the whole attempt teh LARGER picture GOES amiss ... NEITHER the author KNWOS nor presents when asked EXTEMPOR makes it up TO MAINTAIN his ANTIPOPULSIT mood .. this where everything falls FLAT
• THE SARVAMOOLA shud be studied ina A PROCEDURAl MANNER and with NIYAMAS , when one does NOT do that HE gets a WRONg pcture .. and sometimes misses the ACTUAL purport .. HWOEVER when AMJOrity fo scholars LACK that NIYAMA we get distirted versions everywhere .. HENCE teh use of WRD ashaddhala !
• shubha ratri , am on travel for few days , hope memebers will keep forum alive
• March 2 at 3:26pm
• LOOK at the MOVIE , you shall see MADHWACHARYA deply angushied , having desires , udvega , thinking with doubt .. A person who is DVAITA will never view MADHWACHARYA that way ..
• taht shows sript writer has NOT even a INKING IOTA of knwoledeg of who IS VAYU what is HIS PRATAAP ... che is the only word that can come out of my MOUTH .. looking at such PERCEPTIONS ... CAN anyone be called SCHOLAR this way ?
• look at teh portrayal of BRAMHANAS in the movies IMPOVERISHED , half clad , THE 13 THE century was FULL OF vIBRANCY AFFLUENCE and POMP ...
• we all know OUR GRANDFATHERS owned 1000's acres of LANDS .. in previosu century itself , so gong back SUCH imagination is NOT evn mentioned in BOOKS , why TONE down EXEMPLARY ERA
• why PAINT a wrong PICTURE ,, either admit LACK of KNWOLEDGE or say DELIBERATE ATTEMPT .. BUT do NOT BOAST scholarship
• PAERHAPS that deliberate POOR PORTRAYAL is what he calls as BALANCING ACT
• I say dhik
• shubh ratri
• IS ther any counter ? has DR cared to clear ...
• has anybody else given samarthan ? if not why DO analyse ?
• why is teh analysis needed to be DONE , that will give an insight into TODAYS youth aged and spiritualistsespecially AMDHWA clan
• there is an underlying STATEMENT in silence SO amny are appreciating WHATS YOUR PROBLEM MAN .. and what IF i dont CARE about YOU !