Madhwacharya Guna Chintane - 1

• WHAT was the necesity of MADHWACHARYA to interact [ in shastra point of view ] and indulge in VED IC discussion with SUDRA king of GUJRAAT [ and proove to hi about vedas ] .... 2> what was necessity to MEET and speak MLETCHA KING and talk in MLETCHA BHASHA [ talking in MLETCAH BHASHA is prohibited by neetishsatra ] { the reasoning given in sumadhwa vijaya by translators seems not SATISFYING and is contradictory ]
• The question was NOT whether what VAYUdeva did was RIGHT or wrong !!!! the question was WHAT NECCESITATED such action against DICTUM ? there was no need to prove VEDAS to a SUDRA ! that too for teh HIGHEST JEEVA like MADHWACHARYA ... [ MADHWACHARYA has SARVASIUDDHI ]
• ALSO when MADHWACHARYA [ along with shishya could cross GANGA ..] so also they couldahve crossed over to HIAMLAYAS .. what was neceessity to do SAINYA sthamban and TALK to a MLETCHA ?
• THOSE who HAVE SUMADHWA VIJAYA browse to concerend section and PLEASE come with WHAT SCHOLARS have said on the ISSUE !! taht would serve the discussion even better
• TOPIC ko aage badhaao .. has anyone done manan on this issue ?
• DOES VAYU chnage NEETI in apatkaala .. ? in NARAYAN ASTRA episode BHEEMSENA does not budge .. YUGA KAALA does not shud not AFFECT VAYUDEVA .. SO SCHOLAR 1 is BOGUS explanation
• why BOGUS ? because a MADHWACHARYA had already done JALA STHAMBAN and SAINYA STHAMBANA .. SHISHYAS could not do that , SO WHERE is teh LESSON for APATKAALA .. [ does that MEAN ACHARYA asked them to DO SAINYA STHAMABAN in APATKAALA ] seems contradictory ...
• INFACT the MLETCHA KING was terribly TERRIFIED .. his whole ARMY had just BECOME INEEFECTIVE ... and HE was In front of MOST POWERFUL MAN ... so whose APATKALAA was it ?]\
• MLETCHA king had OFFERED HALF KINGDOM .. so that atleast HALF will be SAFE .. THAt showed HE was trembling wanted SAFETY of his LIFE .. where is the DIPLOMACY angle HERE ?
• when WHOLE ARMY could not DO anything toa GREAT saint what an ORDINARY SINGLE weakling kING COULD DO that when HE has crossed his GUARDS and STANDING before HIM .... DOES these scholars UNDERSTAND ABC of STHAMBAN siddhi
• they ahve made an act of EXTRAORDINARY COURAGE and TACT turn into a APATKAALA [ helpless situation ] APPALLING is the only WORD that comes to MIND
• THIS INCIDENT shows EXTERME KRUPA of NARYANA on MADHWACHARYA ... KAALA or NO KAALA or KALIKAALA .. ONLY VAYU HAS his WAY ... come WHAT MAY
• if it were teh QUESTION of APATKAALA . after doing STHAMBAN , there was NO DANGER left anyhow , ALL the GURU SHISHYAS would have easily SLIPPED away to NEXT destination [ that would be COWARDICE ] SO ACHARYA headed STRAIGHT to MLETCHA and ASKED ... WOULD you willingly LET us WAY [ LOOK I HAVE COME OBLIGE ! is the tone ] or want some ADVENTURE ?
• HERE a DHAMAKI if always GIVEN in NATIVE tongue makes one TREMBLE more .. [ no chance of misunderstanding at all , so that opponent can escape saying I thought differently may be due to LANGUAGE problem ] SO ACHARYA staright away TELLS in NO MEAN terms GIVE WAY .. I am the SON of GOD !
• There is a issue with THINKING that MAY be the JEEVA was SATVIK , but had that been SO , his name would have been given in SUMADHWAVIJAYA ... AUTHOR just lightly refers to this man as MLETCHA , showing NO importance to this BEING [ yes BECAUSE what is this single piece creature BEFORE MADHWACHARYA to find MENTION ]
• this was not explained because the SLAVE MENTALITY is still linegering in the NEO scholars .. THEY fail to even ACKNOWLEDGE the GREATEST PERSON before a chillar MLETCHA
• THINKING that MADHWACHARYTA spke in MLETCHA BHASHA [ even though shatsras say NA mletcha BHASHA bruyaat ]
• the neeti in VIPATKAALA .. is to use SIDDHIS to nullify opponents .. not diplomacy
• just by speaking in mloetcha bahsha would a KING leave a WEAK bramhan standing before his ARMY trying to do A DEvakarya [ which his RELIGION does NOT accept ] which NEETI are teh scholars TALKING ABOUT ?
• JAGNNATH DASARU used AGNI ASTRA when surrounded bY MELTCHA ARMY !!!! what was neeti HERE !!!
• WIN over your enenmies is the ONLY NEETI
• THe interpretation that MLETCHA offered HALF kingdom in ana APPRECIATIVE mood [ trying to say MADHWACHARYA IMPRESSED this LIMBU TIMBU to score a NEETI POINT ] is far fetched FAULTY idea ,, CAN a afghan stand a CHANCE before 8 FEET MAIGHTY wrestler ade
• what kind of SOLDIERS were these .. the MUSLIM ARMY was knwon for its BARBARIC acts against HINDUS ...and GIVEN a HINDU saint having entered their CANTONMENT CAMPED for WAR , THESE woudl LIKE SAVAGES fall onthe INTRUDER and try to KILL .. NOt one not
• it si mentioned .. he fell at feet , he even says the KING mentions that it is but surprise that you ahve crossed over savage army ... " these words ahve been hiughly toned down by TRANSLATORS , i have been reading again and again over years these verses .. I was never convinced with all translators .. and NOt at all by VIPAT kaal theory ...
• BUT when author says the meltcha fell at FEET , it is but obvious that it is for SAFETY [ how does a MLETCHA get a bout of BHAKTI ] accordinga GREATER STATUS to aftera all a MLETCHA is far fetched APPEASING [ by translators ]
• SECOND is over stressing of AGONY of SHISHYAS of the MADHWACHARYA on teh BANKS of GANGA ... translators here seem to suggest as if teh SHISHYAS of GREAT MADHWACHARYA were helpless and FEARFUL of MUSLIM ARMY .. [ I do not BUY thsi THEORY at all ][ shishay of MADHWACHARYA either SESHAMSA or RUDRAMSHA .. how can they eb intimidated by a SMALL ARMY of sword yielding MLETCHAS .. thi is ridiculously BELITTLING
• if you dwell deeply .. the dilemma of SHISHYAS were [ infact USHA raised this point ] being SANYASIS is VIOLENCE an option ?
• in another incident .. when dacoits attack the TROUPE of SHISHYAS of MADHWACHARYA , ACHARYA orders one of his shishyas to USE MARTIAL ARTS and snatch weapons of all teh dacoits ! here ACHARYA instructs that SANYASI too can SAFEGUARD his BODY and belongings when UNDER THREAT .. SO VIOLENCE is OPTION [ if diplomatic STHAMBAN seems not workable ] ...
• VIOLENCE is not right word , HE shud resort to FORCIBLE OVERPOWERING of OPPONENT by use of STRENGTH [ spiritual or physical whichever is OPTIMAL ]
• INTERESTINGLY VIJAYEENDRA TEERTHARU uses a UNIQUE method .. HE fires a coconut .. when MUSLIM ARMY explodes the coconut , whoever does that his own SKULL exploded .,.. SO thsi made teh ARMY FLEECE seeing once own head samshing SOLDIERS RETREATED
• NOW this was NO MARAN mantra BUT NOT ANYLESS either
• JAGANNATh dasaru once was taking bath in a river which had standing crop at its bank ...he was all alone no other being around ... just then a huge army comes by [ these armies had extreme HATE towards HINDUS and plunder , torture was their NATURE .. J
• That is why I say if you [ HRISHI ] have urge to put an end to mENACE . RAISING VOICE is USELESS EXERCISE ... ACT with POWER
• BUT it is with SIDDHI . not with JOSH
• IN SUTRA bhasya when ACHARYA says , APATTAPARIHAAR must be done .. [ there was a counter argument that it is OPTIONAL ] in ccounter prativadi had givenexample of JADA BHARAT not offering any resistance when beaten ..
• BUT WHEN the birth iis the LAST one , [ whether you die without giving resistance ] you reach AMUKTA vaikuntha .. [ even if you save , kalaantar death will give amukta vaikuntha , so a for VIRAKTA which will be better option ? ]
• but if your birth is NOT LAST one .. [then dying at the hands of a EVIL without offering a RESISTANCE or defence .. ] will give more HEEN births .. so ONE DEFINITELY DOES APATPARIHAAR liek SHIVA from BHASMASURA .. the question si IS SHIVA lesse VIRAKTA than JADA BHARAT ?]
• SO that answers even for APAROKSHI APATPARIHAAR is must .. and more so in KALIKAALa use of force is MUST .. [ spiritual force is MORE important ..] TANTRA SAARA is for that purpose only .. OTHERWISE why does ACHARYA talk about SHARA mantra niyojan .. if it were of NO USE in todya's times
• pointlessness is for the mind that assumes it .. MADHWACHARYA if he ahs chosen t write a GRANTHA
• thenthere must be a purpose , if one doesnt understand than it cannot be POINTLESS
• MADHWACHARYA has chosen to ARGUE with A SUDRA KING WHY ? there must be a purpose ... [ we cannot attribute desh kaal paristhithi BINDING on MADHWACHARYA and say OH sudra have become POWERFUL so even ACHARYA hadto .. [ i feel not like to even mention THAT how come ACHARYA have WEAKNESS .. IT is beyond imagination and infact MALICFE of modern writers
• the fact that everybody shud be silenced when one questions [ especiallywhen he is in INFLUENTIAL position , if he opposses one need nOT SIT quiet ONE must SILENCE the opponent whoever he may be ]]
• HEre LORD has chosen SUDRAS to bein prominent position , MADHWACHARYA has cut through his PATH amongst these DESH kaal paristhithi ... all along he has SHOWNthat one cannot say that I WILL NOT talk to SUDRA , I will not TALK mletcha BAHSHA . [ this would only isolate our own self rather than world ]
• RAYARU sets the same precedent by SHOWNG his POWER to MASUD khan .. and TALKING to MONROE in ENGLISH ... so to establish a SYSTEM , all other minor CHANGES are WELCOME .. acceptable .. is teh MESSAGE ...
• but leaving aside the SYSTEM [ MADHWA ] if we for our UDAR POSHNA do mletcha SAMBHASHANA and SUDRA samparka ..citing these examples as APATKAAL neeti , that would be FAULTY conclusions
• without proper siddhi sadhana one must NOT evnture to LECTURE or revoloutionise concepts ... THAt will boomerang badly ..
• AS bheemsen VAYU does not even use single astra ... BUt as MADHWACHARYA he uses many siddhis , jala sthamban , akarshan/vashitva [boat episode , udupi krishna in gopichandan ] , laghima siddhi[ child temple episode ] garima siddhi [ wrestling episode ] , ishatva siddhi [ sudra king ploughing ] , udaan vayu siddhi [ thieves ] ,mantra siddhi [ veda mantra vrikshaankur ] etc etc ... WHY was it neccessary ?